What is in hindsight a foolish way to do generator expressions

March 5th, 2009
programming, python, tech
In python I often want to do things like this:
       if x.startswith("foo") for all x in a_list:
          ...

       if is_verb(leaf) for some leaf in a_tree:
          ...
    
I usually end up coding these a bunch of different ways, the shortest of which are:
        if False not in [x.startswith("foo") for x in a_list]:
           ...

        if True in [is_verb(leaf) for leaf in a_tree]:
           ...
    
But these don't short circut and are ugly. Sometimes I'll write little funtions but I don't like that either. Currently the syntax if [expr] for ... doesn't mean anything, so this should be possible. I wonder if it would be worth writing a PEP.

Update 3/6/2009: George Dahl writes that python already does this. I should be writing those examples as:

       if all(x.startswith("foo") for x in a_list):
          ...

       if any(is_verb(leaf) for leaf in a_tree):
          ...
    
These examples use generator expressions instead of list comprehensions. And builtins any and all. Especially as one can use any function, not just any or all, this is a much nicer syntax than what I wanted. It doesn't read as fluidly as english, but then again it doesn't deal with these two specific case as special cases of the if statement. So I'm quite happy.

The only other real downside is also I think the reason I didn't end up with this when fiddling around at the python prompt: you need somewhat non-intuitive parens. I'm pretty sure when I was trying to see if there was a way to do what I wanted I did:

    >>> x for x in range(7)
      File "<stdin>", line 1
        x for x in range(7)
            ^
      SyntaxError: invalid syntax
    
And then moved on. As a human I don't see an obvious reason why I can't enter the obvious thing. Is there something else a statement beginning with "x for " could mean?

Comment via: facebook

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Where I Donated In 2024

All Grants Fund, Rethink, EA Funds Animal Welfare Fund

via Thing of Things January 17, 2025

2024-25 New Year review

This is an annual post reviewing the last year and setting intentions for next year. I look over different life areas (work, health, parenting, effectiveness, travel, etc) and analyze my life tracking data. Overall this was a pretty good year. Highlights …

via Victoria Krakovna January 15, 2025

The ugly sides of two approaches to charity

What's neglected by "magnificent" philanthropy, and by Singerian global poverty focus The post The ugly sides of two approaches to charity appeared first on Otherwise.

via Otherwise January 13, 2025

more     (via openring)