Growth of Publicly Available Genetic Sequencing Data

July 20th, 2023
bio, nao
Cross-posted from my NAO Notebook

The largest source of publicly available genetic sequencing data is the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), a joint project of the US (NCBI), Europe (EBI), and Japan (DDBJ). Most relevant funding agencies and journals require sequencing data to be deposited in the SRA. I was curious how quickly it has been growing, so I ran some queries.

The metadata for the SRA is available in the cloud and we can access it through BigQuery. I ran:

  SELECT EXTRACT(YEAR from releasedate),
         EXTRACT(MONTH from releasedate),
         SUM(mbases),
         SUM(mbytes)
    FROM `nih-sra-datastore.sra.metadata`
GROUP BY EXTRACT(YEAR from releasedate),
         EXTRACT(MONTH from releasedate)

This gave me how much new data there was each month, in terms of both genetic bases and (compressed) bytes on disk.

Note the logarithmic y-axis.

This is reminiscent of another chart, the cost to sequence 1M bases:

(This is a pretty amazing chart, with the huge drop around 2008 coming from NGS Sequencing)

We could combine these, to get a rough estimate for how much money is being spent to sequence the data going into the SRA, but to do this we need to know how long a delay there is between sequencing and releasing: if it cost $400/Mb in 2007-10, $100/Mb in 2008-01, and $15/MB in 2008-04, then which cost should we use for interpreting data released in 2008-06? Here's a plot showing models 0-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month delays:

It looks like maybe ~9m is the initial delay, and with costs changing more slowly in recent years it doesn't matter much for more recent data.

Looking just at the last five years, after it has leveled out some, it looks like a steady ~1.2e16 bases annually:

Comment via: facebook, lesswrong, mastodon

Recent posts on blogs I like:

AIs as Humanity's Children

in which I have opinions about AI

via Thing of Things January 22, 2025

2024-25 New Year review

This is an annual post reviewing the last year and setting intentions for next year. I look over different life areas (work, health, parenting, effectiveness, travel, etc) and analyze my life tracking data. Overall this was a pretty good year. Highlights …

via Victoria Krakovna January 15, 2025

The ugly sides of two approaches to charity

What's neglected by "magnificent" philanthropy, and by Singerian global poverty focus The post The ugly sides of two approaches to charity appeared first on Otherwise.

via Otherwise January 13, 2025

more     (via openring)