Doulas Would Save Insurers Money |
November 4th, 2013 |
health, insurance, money |
Some rough looking online suggests most doulas charge between $400 and $1000. On average private insurers pay out $18,329 for a vaginal birth and $27,866 for a Cesarean. [1] In one randomized controlled study of providing doulas at hospital births (n=420) they found that the C-section rate dropped from 25% to 13.4%. [2] Naively combining these figures, current hospital practice costs insurers around $20.7k per birth [3] while providing doulas would bring average costs down to $19.6k [4]. This isn't a huge difference, but at $1100 it's enough more than a doula would charge for the insurer to come out ahead.
Cost is definitely not the only thing we should consider in determining what medical care someone should get, but when something not only provides benefits but also reduces costs it seems like a clear choice.
[1] The
Cost of Having a Baby in the United States (Truven Health
Analytics, 2013). Truven maintains a medical database, MarketScan, which has
cost information for various medical procedures. It's not fully clear
how they get their data and seems to involve lots of agreements with
employers to share claim results, but the New York Times seems
to trust it.
[2] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous Labor Support for Middle-Class couples: Effect on Cesarean Delivery Rates (McGrath and Kennell, 2008). They randomly assigned 420 women giving birth at a hospital to have a professional doula present or not. Of the ones with doulas, 13.4% ended up getting C-sections while of the ones getting conventional care 25.0% did.
[3] $27,866 * 25.0% + $18,329 * 75.0% = $20,713
[4] $27,866 * 13.4% + $18,329 * 86.6% = $19,607
Comment via: google plus, facebook, r/pregnant