Beards and Masks?

January 18th, 2025
airquality, masks
In general, you're not supposed to wear a beard with a respirator mask (N95, P100, etc), at least not in a way where you have facial hair under the seal:

cdc chart showing beard
styles and whether its ok to wear a respirator

But how much worse is the fit? A P100 with a beard is going to filter less well than a P100 without a beard, but does it do as well as an N95? Or is it hopelessly compromised? And is stubble as bad as a full beard? Does length matter? In an emergency where I really need my mask for protection should I shave?

Bottom line up front: with my rough DIY test setup I got 80% filtration with a long beard, 92% with a short one, and 99.7% with stubble. But see my note at the end about a weird effect I saw.

What was my test setup? The goal is to measure the difference between filtered and unfiltered air. I have a Temtop M2000 meter, which I'd bought to measure air quality for testing my ceiling fan air purifier idea, so I can use that as a sensor. Burning matches is still a fine way of putting enough smoke in the air that I can see differences. And then I can measure the effect of the mask by measuring at my 3M HF-802SD elastomeric respirator's exhale valve, with the meter in a bag, and seeing how smoky it is (pm2.5). With the filter cartridges inserted I can measure the effect of the mask, while with them removed I'm measuring essentially no filtration. The ratio of particles with vs without the filters is my filtration efficacy.

This isn't perfect:

  • My lungs or the the non-filter parts of the mask might be doing some filtration.

  • My seal with the bag might not be 100%.

  • The bag needs to be unsealed to let air out, or it will burst. But maybe this also lets a little smoky air in.

All of these are off in the same direction, however: my measurement is likely to be a lower bound in filtration efficacy.

To actually build this I made a small hole in a gallon ziplock, and attached it around the vent of my elastomeric respirator. The first time I did this I used packing tape, which didn't work very well and kept coming loose:

respirator attached to
bag, shown from the bottom with a visible gap

I did it again with duct tape:

respirator attached to bag,
shown from the top with no gaps

I made sure to get a good seal all the way around:

respirator attached to
bag, shown from the bottom with no gaps

Then I realized I wanted to test this with a pretty long beard to start, so put this on hold for a month while growing out my beard. I got to maybe 1 1/4":

me, with my beard quite long,
shown from the side

Here's it combed to show the full length, though for all these tests I had it flat against my face.

me, with my beard quite
long, shown from the front

I put on the mask, put the meter in the bag, and the bag started to inflate:

image of full fit testing setup

The mask has a fit test button, which blocks the inhalation valve: if you can still breathe in with it pressed you know air is making its way under the seal. I didn't feel much air coming in, but I did feel some.

I took a series of measurements, alternating filter status. Qualitatively, each time I put the filters in/out it immediately changed whether I could smell smoke.

Filters? pm2.5 pm10
No 328.5 509.9
Yes 51.5 76.5
No 264.0 400.3
Yes 49.7 74.4
No 199.2 302.5

Since I expected the level of smoke in the room to slowly drop over time, doing interleaved measurements was quite important.

With a full beard, it looks like the mask cut pm2.5 from 263.9 to 50.6 (-79%), and pm10 from 404.2 to 75.5 (-81%).

Then I trimmed my beard with a bead trimmer set to 3/8":

beard trimmer set to three eights

This is where I normally trim by beard to:

me, after trimming my beard to 3/8

I tried combing it out, but at this length it doesn't do anything:

me from the front with a
short beard

I made more smoke and repeated the measurements:

Filters? pm2.5 pm10
No 349.1 555.3
Yes 22.9 34.6
No 338.6 539.3
Yes 25.1 37.9
No 264.4 418.5

This time the filters brought pm2.5 from 317.4 to 24.0 (-92%) and pm10 from 504.4 to 36.3 (-93%).

Then I used the shaver with no guard to remove as much of my beard as I could, getting down to maybe 1/32" stubble:

me after removing my beard, with
short stubble

And from the front:

me with short stubble, from the front

More measurements:

Filters? pm2.5 pm10
No 436.2 713.2
Yes 1.0 1.4
No 307.0 486.6
Yes 0.8 1.0
No 261.1 417.4

The filters now took pm2.5 from 334.8 to 0.9 (-99.7%), and pm10 from 539.1 to 1.2 (-99.8%). This is great!

Additionally, when I tried the fit test button I now couldn't breathe in at all, which actually felt a bit terrifying.

Overall I'm pretty happy with these results, except for one wrinkle: the meter reliably read a higher number when measuring my exhalant than it did in the ambient air. How could that be?

I tried a few more tests:

  • Putting the meter in the bag and not blowing in: same as ambient, then slowly decreasing (probably particles settling?). It never plateaued, just kept going down slowly.

  • Breathing directly into the bag with no mask: elevated from ambient

  • Using an air mattress pump to inflate the bag: elevated from ambient

  • Repeating my test in a room with minimal smoke: probably same results but harder to tell because the numbers were small.

pumping air into the bag, and
measuring it with the M2000

Here are the numbers from what I think is the clearest test, using the pump to inflate the bag:

Status pm2.5 pm10
Ambient 156.4 235.1
In bag, after waiting and just before pump 37.0 54.9
With pump, after plateauing 219.6 327.5
Ambient 117.5 177.7

I don't know where this is coming from, but possibly it's due to pressure? I suspect that whatever the effect is it's a scalar effect, and so is compatible with interpreting filtration ratios, but I don't know for sure.


This was also the first time my kids had seen me without a beard:

Comment via: facebook, lesswrong, mastodon, bluesky

Recent posts on blogs I like:

Where I Donated In 2024

All Grants Fund, Rethink, EA Funds Animal Welfare Fund

via Thing of Things January 17, 2025

2024-25 New Year review

This is an annual post reviewing the last year and setting intentions for next year. I look over different life areas (work, health, parenting, effectiveness, travel, etc) and analyze my life tracking data. Overall this was a pretty good year. Highlights …

via Victoria Krakovna January 15, 2025

The ugly sides of two approaches to charity

What's neglected by "magnificent" philanthropy, and by Singerian global poverty focus The post The ugly sides of two approaches to charity appeared first on Otherwise.

via Otherwise January 13, 2025

more     (via openring)