A function that returns twice: fork() |
December 6th, 2012 |
tech |
random_boolean() { // seed our random number generator with the current time srand(time(0)); // return true half the time, false half the time return rand() % 2; } main() { if (random_boolean()) printf("true"); else printf("false"); }This will print either "true" or "false", depending on what
random_boolean()
returns. [1] But it doesn't have to be this way:
random_boolean() { return fork(); } main() { if (random_boolean()) printf("true"); else printf("false"); }This will print both "true" and "false":
fork()
returns
twice. What's going on? When a program calls fork()
the
operating system clones it, returning true to the original and false
to the clone [2]. The flow of control splits.
You might wonder: what if I ran a program like:
main() { while (1) fork(); }Roughly, each time through the loop we double the number of processes. That should exponentially create processes, which might be bad. As it happens, several years ago I did wonder about this. To find out, I wrote a program, and discovered that it is in fact quite bad, crashing my machine extremely quickly. After which I moved on until one evening about a year later when everyone in my operating systems class was trying to finish a project due at midnight. Working remotely, ssh'ed from my edge-of-campus dorm into the cs department's login server (which was also the primary file server), I ran
~/a.out
when I meant to run ./a.out
. This took down
every computer in the department:
From: Jeff Kaufman To: Swarthmore CS Department Sysadmin Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:00:59 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Allspice accidental downtime I accidentally ran a fork bomb on Allspice, making it was unusable at user level for about 25 minutes. The fork bomb was sitting (very stupidly) in my home directory as a.out, left over from messing around with it almost a year ago. I then ran ~/a.out instead of ./a.out. Much badness ensued. Mary had keys to the server room, so we came down to the science center and rebooted allspice. Everything seems to be ok now. Multitudinous apologies, Jeff PS: perhaps this makes a good case for ulimits?Arriving at the science center to fix the problem I had created, my classmates were pretty unhappy with me.
After this we shifted remote logins to go to random lab machines via round-robin dns instead of to the central server.
[1] While gcc
will compile this code as written, you
shouldn't actually write C like this. I'm writing tersely to keep
the important stuff from drowning in the verbosity of C.
[2] Technically it returns 0 to the clone and the process id of the clone to the original. Which are usually called parent and child. Minor details.
Comment via: google plus, facebook