Next: Conjunction
Up: The Interpretation of Noun
Previous: What to do
First, we'll need an extension for John and Mary. For the time
being, let's take the following:
-
and
=
Evaluation will then be something like:
-
John and Mary ate
=
Under this approach any verb that can be used with an
and-connected argument needs to know how to parse the set
appropriately. We also are restricted in that we can't have a verb
like ate
sometimes be given entities, as in John ate,
and sometimes sets. This requires us to consider all noun phrases as
sets of entities.
Note that as John and Mary are
noun phrases, the extension of John and Mary is not a set
of entities but a set of sets of entities. That is,
-
We would then evaluate a sentence of this form as:
This is all well and good unless we want the other interpretation of this
sentence, that John ate pizza
Mary ate
cabbages. There's no way for ate
to put things together in
the right way, as it is only being given sets and sets are by their
nature unordered. We need something where ate
can match up
things properly, something like a list. So lets redefine the
extension of and:
-
and
=
Now we can have each verb decide on its own how to parse its
arguments. Some verbs will now have ugly extensions, but that's the
domain of lexical semantics.
Next: Conjunction
Up: The Interpretation of Noun
Previous: What to do
2006-04-29